论文部分内容阅读
通过与美洲奴隶种植园经济所做多角度比较 ,可以发现 1 6世纪以来在东欧建立的劳役制庄园 ,无论从主人的本来身份还是从生产目的和生产方式等来看都与经典的“资本主义”有很大不同 ,在这里存在的是农奴对贵族的依附 ,而不是劳动对资本的从属 ,哪怕它是以强迫形式来实现的。因此东欧的“再版农奴制”庄园经济 ,不仅不是真正的“资本主义” ,甚至连“形式上”的资本主义也不是 ,但也不能简单地说它们是“封建的” ,因为随着日益深深地卷入商品和市场的漩涡 ,这种封建庄园经济会逐渐商品化 ,并最终会不同程度地发生转化。
From a multi-angle comparison with the American slave-plantation economy, it can be found that the man-made manor established in Eastern Europe in the sixteenth century, both in terms of its original identity as well as its production purpose and mode of production, is similar to the classic “Capitalism ”There is a big difference, where serfs are attached to nobility rather than slave to capital, even if it is done by force. Therefore, the “republican serfdom” estate economy in Eastern Europe is not only not true “capitalism” nor is it “formalistic” capitalism, but it can not be simply said that they are “feudal” because as it deepens Deeply involved in the whirlpool of goods and markets, this feudal manor economy will be gradually commercialized, and eventually will be transformed to varying degrees.