“十七年”文学在建构阶级与身体享乐的关系时,具有明显的政治预设性,而性别是参与这种建构的重要因素。对于不同的性别来说,身体享乐所具有的批判指向可以在政治和道德之间滑动,追求享乐的男性其政治上的“反革命”是第一位的,道德问题则是第二位的;追求享乐的女性其道德问题是第一位的,政治上的“反革命”则是第二位的,由此形成了“十七年”文学性别参与阶级与身体享乐关系的叙事模式。不过,在性别因素的介入下,也产生了一些溢出上述叙述框架的“身体享乐”书写:因为与时代的距离,落后或者边缘的女性人物沉浸在个人欲望的世界中,身体享乐对她们而言不仅表现为一种身体需求,同时,在个人的意义上,它更与自我的精神世界紧密相连,是她们自我认同的一种方式。这样一种叙述模糊了由身体享乐带来的明确的阶级划分。 “Seventeen Years ” literature has obvious political presuppositions in building the relationship between class and body pleasure, while gender is an important factor in participating in this kind of construction. For different genders, the critique of body hedonism points to a slide between politics and morality, and the pursuit of hedonism is the first of its political “counter-revolution” and the moral one is the second ; The pursuit of hedonism for women is the first of its moral problems, political “counter-revolution” is the second, which formed the “seventeen ” literary gender to participate in the relationship between the enjoyment of the body and the class narrative mode. However, with the intervention of gender, there has also been some writing of “body pleasure” that spills over the narrative framework: because the distance with the times, backward or marginalized female characters immersed in a world of personal desires, the body enjoyment to them In the meantime, it manifests itself not only as a kind of physical need, but also as an individual in the sense that it is more closely linked with the spiritual world of the ego as a way of self-identification. Such a narrative blurs the explicit class division brought about by body pleasure.