论文部分内容阅读
本文主要讨论在不表示可能的“动词 +得 +后续成分”这一结构形式中 ,“动得”的性质以及动词与“得”后成分之间的结构关系。通过对“得”后成分为小句 (主谓短语 )、动词短语、形容词或形容词短语等语言现象的详细分析 ,认为“动词 +得 +后续成分”不可能是一种“动词 +中心语 +的 +后续成分”的结构形式 ,“动词 +得”也不可能是省略了中心语的“动词 +的”的体词性结构。动词与“得”后成分的关系是动词与补语的关系。
This article focuses on the structural relationship between “verb +” and “after” components in the structural form that does not indicate the possible “verb + get + follow-up”. Through the detailed analysis of linguistic phenomena such as clauses (verb-predicate phrases), verb phrases, adjectives or adjective phrases, the postmodernist thought that the “verb + got + follow-up components” can not be a verb + central language + + Verb “,” verb + 得 “can not be the body part structure of” verb + “which omits the central word. The relationship between the verb and the ”after" component is the relationship between the verb and the complement.