论文部分内容阅读
从明治维新之后到明治十年初期的本居宣长派等的国学——复古神道派的运动,大多是在政教一致的神学运动被驱逐之后,将其大部分主张脱胎换骨并隐蔽起来,重新继续接受德国文献学等的影响。从近世到近代的国学运动及其实现学术言论化的过程,为我们提供了极其有效的视角。从结论上来说,近世国学是与国民民族主义的成立密切相关的历史性运动。但它是在结合了以往的几个学说的保留的基础上发展而来的。现在看到的文献学的(实证性)国学与非合理性(神学性)国学的关系等问题的存在,其自身实际上是近代学术的自我碰撞的问题。国民的学问学术性制度的成立,在国民民族主义的创造—想象中曾是一个重要的动量。
After the Meiji Restoration to the early Meiji decade of the Kuomintang propaganda and other national studies - retro Shinto movement, most of the theology and religion are theocratic theological movement was expelled, most of its ideas are hidden and covert again, to resume Accept the influence of German literature and so on. The process of the Sinology movement from its late age to the modern era and its realization of academic speech make us an extremely effective perspective. In conclusion, the ancient Chinese learning is a historic movement closely related to the establishment of nationalist nationalism. But it was developed on the basis of a combination of reservations from several previous doctrines. The existence of such issues as the empirical (positivist) Sinology and the non-rational (theological) Sinology that we now see is actually a matter of the self-collision of modern scholarship. The establishment of the academic system of learning for the people has been an important momentum in the creation and imagination of nationalism.