近年来,有专家学者从诉讼法学或证据学的角度对这一原则提出质疑,认为“案件事实都是过去的事情,而过去是不可能复原和再现的,过去甚至是不可知的,提出应当”以证据为依据“的观点,以及以”法律事实“代替”客观事实“的观点。笔者认为,作为一项司法原则,一种司法信念,以”事实为根据“仍然不可动摇。本文从”以事实为根据“的内涵、存在基础、价值、取向等方面进行了论述。提出了正确把握”以事实为根据“与”以证据为依据“的关系的想法。 In recent years, some experts and scholars have challenged this principle from the perspective of procedural law or evidence theory, believing that ”the facts of the case are all things in the past, but the past can not be recovered and reproduced, and the past is even unknown. Should be “evidence-based” point of view, as well as “legal fact ” instead of “objective fact ” point of view.In my opinion, as a judicial principle, a kind of judicial belief, “fact ”Is still unshakable.This paper from the “ based on facts ”the connotation, there is a foundation, value, orientation and other aspects of the discussion.Proposed to correctly grasp “ based on facts ”and “ based on evidence ”The idea of ​​the relationship.