论文部分内容阅读
新安江支流练河之滨的徽城镇,一起民事诉讼案历时两年多至今未了。关键问題在于一份档案凭据上。欲知内情蹊跷,请看——三代共居房权谁属歙县徽城镇渔梁街常青路20—4号,一幢不大不小的旧式二层楼房,它已祖传三代,直至1969年住着几户汪姓人家,素来和睦共处,相安无争。此后,概由汪天元一家独住。1900年当地政府登记房产时,汪天元认为这是由他继承的房产,已经住了快一辈子了,自然归他所有,就登记在自己名下。事后,汪天元的几个侄子,侄女对此提出异议,认定这份房产原系祖辈汪永发、汪永宝兄弟的共同财产,父辈过世早就由他们分別继承,并且共同居住了几十年,如今怎么成了汪天元的个人私有私产?想独吞,那不行!就找上门来理论,说大伯不该如
Xin’anjiang tributary of the riverside emblem of the town, a civil case lasted more than two years has not yet. The key issue is a copy of the evidence. For strange insider information, please see - Three generations of common ownership Who is Shexian Hui Town, Sheung Wan Yue Liang Street, No. 20-4, a modest old two-story building, it has ancestral generations of three generations until 1969 Surviving a few families surnamed Wang, has always been living in harmony, in vain. Since then, Wang Tianyuan probably live alone. When the local government registered the property in 1900, Wang Tianyuan thought it was a real estate inherited by him and had lived for almost his entire life. Naturally, he owned it and registered himself under his own name. Afterwards, several nephews and nieces of Wang Tianyuan objected to this and found that the property was originally owned by their ancestors Wang Yongfa and Wang Yongbao’s brothers, and their fathers passed away from each other for several decades Wang Tianyuan’s personal private property? Want to be swallowed, it does not work! To come to the theory, that uncle should not