论文部分内容阅读
黑格尔辩证法的局限性表明他只是注意到了事物在时间上的继起而忽视了空间上的并存,辩证法在这里充当的是描述性的工具。这里也可以看出,仅仅将黑格尔的辩证法的基础由唯心换成唯物是远远不够的,因为这样得到的仍只是一个外在形式的描述。他应用这种方法来考察事物,尽管猜到了事物终将否定自身,但由于找不到事物真正的发展动因,因此只能得出保守性的结论,这既是由于他缺乏对现实事物发展动因的研究又是由于其唯心主义立场造成的。相反,马克思通过对资本主义社会,尤其是政治经济学的研究,继承和发展了黑格尔的辩证法,创立了科学的、革命的方法论——唯物辩证法。它不仅仅以事物在时间上的发展为指向,更注重对事物内部结构关系的探讨,从而在方法论内容上也赋予了辩证法以新的形式。
The limitations of Hegelian dialectics suggest that he only notices the temporal succession of things and ignores the coexistence of space. Dialectics here serves as a descriptive tool. It can also be seen here that it is not enough simply to change the basis of Hegel’s dialectics from idealism to materialism, since what is thus obtained is still an outward-looking description. He applied this method to examine things. Although it was guessed that things would eventually negate themselves, he could only conclude a conservative conclusion because he could not find the real developmental motivation of things. This was due to his lack of motivation for the development of real things Again, research is caused by its idealist position. On the contrary, through the study of capitalist society, especially political economy, Marx inherited and developed Hegelian dialectics and established a scientific and revolutionary methodology - materialist dialectics. It not only points to the development of things in time, but also focuses on the discussion of the internal relations of things, thus giving dialectics a new form in the methodology.