对拟建工程项目,特别是特大型水利枢纽、远距离调水工程、大型钢铁基地、港口建设、能源基地、农业商品粮基地等进行可行性论证,已形成制度。但在论证前或论证中,让全国各方面的专家、学者乃至平民百姓,充分发表意见,则至今尚不多见。有的虽也争鸣了一下,但对争鸣及其效应却还缺乏思想准备,对争鸣的意义认识还不足,处理的方法也不尽人意。其实,对一项建设项目产生不同意见是很正常的事。分歧可以来自专业性质和考察问题角度的不同,也可能是价值观差异所致。而各 The feasibility study on the proposed project, especially the large-scale water control project, long-distance water diversion project, large steel base, port construction, energy base and agricultural commodity grain base has formed a system. However, before the demonstration or demonstration, letting experts, scholars and civilians from all walks of life in the country fully express their opinions, it is still rare today. Although some contend for a moment, there is still a lack of ideological preparation for contention and its effects. The understanding of the meaning of contention is not enough and the methods of handling are not satisfactory either. In fact, it is normal to have different opinions on a construction project. Disagreements can come from differences in the nature of the profession and from the point of view of the investigation or from the differences in values. And each