论文部分内容阅读
程顺之同志的文章《填空练习不利于智力的发展》(以下简称《程文》,刊《语文教学与研究》—九八二年第八期)列举了“机械的”填空练习三大弊病:一曰“不利于培养具有‘见疑’和‘创造’能力的人”;二曰“不利于培养学生思维能力的发展”,三曰“导致题海战术”。上述观点,值得商榷。何渭“机械的填空”?程文说:“综观填空,大都是死题死填,语言环境是固定的,答案是固定的。”这几乎把所有填空都包含在“机械填空”里
Comrade Cheng Shunzhi’s article “The practice of filling in air is not conducive to the development of intelligence” (hereinafter referred to as “Cheng Wen” and the publication “Language Teaching and Research”—eighth period of 1998) lists three major shortcomings of the “mechanical” filling-in exercise:曰 “is not conducive to the development of people with the ability to ’problem with doubt’ and ’creativity’; Second, ”is not conducive to the development of students’ thinking ability,“ and the three tactics ”lead to the sea tactics.“ The above points are worth discussing. He Xie ”mechanically fills in the blanks“? Cheng Wen said: ”A comprehensive view of the blanks is mostly filled with dead questions, the language environment is fixed, and the answer is fixed.“ This almost all the blanks are included in the ”mechanical blanks"