论文部分内容阅读
《侵权责任法》第15条规定的八项九种责任方式与《物权法》上关于在物权受到侵害时的权利救济方式有所重合,这就涉及权利人维权时的选择与适用问题。简析侵权法15条的侵权请求权与物权法上的物权请求权进行对比,可以在立法目的,权利基础和举证责任等方面区分两部法律的适用情形,并且从行为、对象以及侵害结果等构成要件上剖析适用《侵权法》第15条的条件,有违法阻却事由的行为只能适用于物权法的相关救济,不法行为造成侵害结果的可以适用侵权法的责任承担形式。
Article 8 of the Tort Liability Law stipulates that the eight types of nine forms of liability are overlapped with the remedies of the Real Right Law in the case of property rights infringement, which involves the choice and application of rights holders’ rights. An analysis of the infringement claims of Article 15 of the Tort Law and the claim of the right of property in the Jurisprudence Act can be used to distinguish the application of the two laws in terms of the legislative purpose, the basis of rights and the burden of proof, etc., and from the acts, targets and infringement results Constituent Requirements Analyzing the conditions for applying Article 15 of the Tort Law, the act of obstructing the act of breaking the law can only be applied to the related remedies of the Property Law, and the wrongful act can infringe the result and can be subject to the tort liability.