论文部分内容阅读
目的 :对比探究根管治疗术和干髓术治疗磨牙牙髓炎的近远期疗效。方法 :选取我科2012年5月到2013年5月所接受治疗的130例磨牙牙髓炎患者作为观察对象,其中包括65例根管治疗术和65例干髓术,所有患者随访12~36个月,观察近远期疗效。结果:术后12个月、24个月、36个月的跟踪调查发现,干髓术组和根管组的疗效结果显示P>0.05,差异不具有统计学的意义。干髓术组和根管组手术所使用的平均时间分为别(86±22)min和(150±42)min,组间对比结果显示P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论:根管治疗术和干髓术治疗磨牙牙髓炎的近远期疗效都较好,因干髓术所用手术时间更短,更值得推广治疗磨牙牙髓炎。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term and long-term effects of root canal therapy and stem-marrow surgery in the treatment of dental pulpitis. Methods: A total of 130 cases of dental pulpitis treated from May 2012 to May 2013 in our department were selected as the observation object, including 65 cases of root canal therapy and 65 cases of pulpotomy. All patients were followed up for 12 to 36 Month, observe the short-term effect. Results: The follow-up investigations at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months after operation showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). The average time used for the operation in the medullary and endodontic groups was (86 ± 22) min and (150 ± 42) min, respectively. The comparisons between groups showed that P <0.05, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of root canal therapy and dry pulp therapy for molars are good, and the shorter operation time of dry pulp surgery is more worthy of promotion in the treatment of molars pulpitis.