论文部分内容阅读
目的比较结肠癌腹腔镜根治术与开腹手术治疗的临床效果。方法选取医院就诊并签署知情同意书的结肠癌患者50例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组25例。对照组行传统开腹手术治疗,观察组行腹腔镜结肠癌根治术治疗,观察2组手术效果及术后并发症发生情况。结果观察组术中出血量少于对照组(P<0.01),手术操作时间、术后排气时间及住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.01),术后并发症发生率为8.00%,明显低于对照组的28.00%(P<0.01)。结论结肠癌腹腔镜根治术效果较传统开腹手术更具优势,具有创伤小、出血量少、术后并发症少的优点,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic radical mastectomy and laparotomy for colon cancer. Methods Fifty patients with colon cancer who were hospitalized and signed informed consent were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 25 cases in each group. The control group underwent traditional laparotomy, and the observation group underwent laparoscopic radical resection of colon cancer. The surgical effects and postoperative complications were observed in the two groups. Results The bleeding volume in the observation group was less than that in the control group (P <0.01). The operation time, postoperative exhaust time and hospital stay were shorter than those in the control group (P <0.01). The incidence of postoperative complications was 8.00% Significantly lower than the control group of 28.00% (P <0.01). Conclusions Laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer is more effective than traditional laparotomy. It has the advantages of less trauma, less blood loss and less postoperative complications, which is worthy of clinical application.