论文部分内容阅读
[目的]应用心肺复苏Utstein模式客观、规范地分析心肺复苏仪的复苏成效,探讨其在紧急抢救中的优势。[方法]回顾396例心肺复苏患者中,分为标准心肺复苏组与心肺复苏仪CPR组,比较两者复苏成效及血流动力学情况。[结果]心肺复苏仪CPR组收缩压与血氧饱和度明显高于人工标准CPR组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.01),在复苏失败、ROSC、基本复苏、成功复苏、成活出院等方面,差异也有统计学意义(P﹤0.01)。[结论]心肺复苏仪复苏成效显著,血流动力学效果确切,有效地提高了心肺复苏的成功率,在复苏抢救中占有很大的优势和临床实用价值,值得在急救医疗中全面推广使用。
[Objective] To use the cardiopulmonary resuscitation Utstein model to objectively and statically analyze the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and discuss its advantages in emergency rescue. [Methods] A retrospective study of 396 patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was divided into CPR group and CPR CPR group. The recovery and hemodynamics were compared between the two groups. [Results] The systolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation of cardiopulmonary resuscitator CPR group were significantly higher than those of artificial standard CPR group (P <0.01). CPR group had no significant difference in resuscitation failure, ROSC, basic recovery, successful recovery and survival and discharge , The difference was also statistically significant (P <0.01). [Conclusion] The cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has a significant effect of resuscitation, accurate hemodynamic effect, effectively improving the success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, which has great advantages and clinical practical value in resuscitation and salvage. It is worth to be popularized and used in emergency medical treatment.