贵州新锐作家冉正万的《银鱼来》(《人民文学》2012年第9期)是当年的热议作品,也是第一部有关贵州历史文化的长篇,然而对它的评价存在着某种误读。小说与主流批评、学院批评、地域批评的三重对话,实际已引发出了一些值得深思的问题。一首先是主流批评。一部作品的问世,如果得到媒体批评与作协批评的关注,说明它在某种意义上已得到了主流文学的认可。媒体代表读者、公众的声音,而作协实际具有 Guizhou’s cutting edge writer Ran Zhengwan’s “Silverfish” (“People’s Literature”, No. 9, 2012) was a hot piece of work of that year and the first one about the history and culture of Guizhou. However, there is a certain degree of its evaluation Misreading. The triple dialogue between novels and mainstream criticism, college criticism and geographical criticism has actually triggered some questions worth pondering. First is the mainstream criticism. The advent of a work, if got the media criticism and the criticism of the writers, shows that it has been recognized by the mainstream literature in a certain sense. The media represents readers, the voice of the public, while the writers actually have