近些年来,随着对清代学术研究的展开,以为清代“只有学术,没有思想”的论调已经逐渐被否定了。而清代思想的一个焦点问题,就是礼理之辨。但究竟该如何看待礼理之辨,却还是一个亟待研究的领域。笔者认为,由黄薇香(式三)、黄元同(以周)及元同在南菁书院的诸弟子构成的儆居学派把对这个问题的讨论推向了一个新的高度。本文将在清代学术争论的语境下来审视黄氏父子的理礼之辨,以 In recent years, with the unfolding of academic research in the Qing Dynasty, the argument that the Qing Dynasty was “only academic and without thinking” has gradually been denied. One of the focal points of the Qing thoughts is the distinction between politeness and righteousness. However, it is still an area that needs to be studied urgently. In my opinion, the monastic school formed by Huang Weixiang (formula 3), Huang Yuan Tong (Zhou) and Yuan’s students at Nanjing College pushed the discussion on this issue to a new height. This essay will examine the relationship between Huang’s father and son in the context of academic controversy in the Qing Dynasty