近年来,图书馆理论界出现了一股令人眼花瞭乱的新概念、新方法、新学科迭相推出的潮流。当人们用冷静、审视的眼光评估这些“图书馆高位理论”时,得出的结论竟如此相悖。本来,对于探索中的事物予以毁誉参半的评价是不难理解的,但结论如此对立,不得不引起我们的深思。应当承认,在眼下所出现的“图书馆高位理论”中,确实掺有许多杂质。归纳起来至少有以下几类: In recent years, there has been a dazzling new concept, new method and new discipline in the library theorists, which have been launched in the late 1990s. When people appraise these “library high theories” with a calm, scrutiny, they come to the opposite conclusion. It is not difficult to understand the appraisement of the things under investigation. However, the conclusion is so contradictory that we have to arouse our deep consideration. It should be acknowledged that many of the impurities are indeed mixed in the “high library theory” that emerges right now. To sum up at least the following categories: