论文部分内容阅读
通过对岩体结构面产状用模糊聚类方法和传统玫瑰花图方法分析对比,分析了模糊聚类法及传统方法的优缺点及适用范围。试验分析表明,两种方法对结构面产状分组结论不完全一致,且各自具有一定的适用范围。传统玫瑰花图法更多的反映构造作用及其他地质作用所造成的影响,而模糊聚类方法则可以较好地反映岩体结构面产状组合的影响,从而为坝肩岩体稳定分析提供依据。
Through the analysis and comparison of the fuzzy clustering method and the traditional rose map method, the advantages and shortcomings of the fuzzy clustering method and the traditional method are analyzed. The experimental analysis shows that the two methods are not completely consistent with the conclusion of the surface grouping of the structural plane, and each has a certain scope of application. The traditional rose map method more reflects the tectonic effect and other geological effects. However, the fuzzy clustering method can well reflect the influence of the meso-structure combination of the rock mass and thus provide the stability analysis of the abutment rock mass. in accordance with.