论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨优质护理方法对2型糖尿病患者的预后及生活方式的影响。方法 100例2型糖尿病患者作为本次研究的对象,并根据抛硬币的方法随机将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。对照组采取常规护理,观察组采取优质护理,比较两组患者各项指标情况(糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平)、生活质量评分情况以及护理满意度。结果护理后,观察组患者糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平分别为(5.2±0.9)%、(4.2±0.3)mmol/L、(7.1±3.5)mmol/L,对照组患者糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖水平分别为(6.9±1.1)%、(6.6±0.4)mmol/L、(8.9±2.4)mmol/L,观察组患者各项指标均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组在护理后躯体功能、心理功能、社会功能和物质生活方面评分分别为(65.2±3.1)、(44.9±4.2)、(60.7±4.8)、(52.4±4.5)分,对照组的评分分别为(51.9±4.9)、(38.6±5.2)、(53.8±4.9)、(56.6±3.7)分,观察组患者的各项指标评分均优于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度(96.0%)明显高于对照组(82.0%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优质护理方法对2型糖尿病患者的预后及生活方式的影响深远,值得进一步推广应用。
Objective To investigate the effects of quality nursing on the prognosis and life style of type 2 diabetic patients. Methods One hundred patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were selected as the subjects of this study. Patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group according to the method of coin tossing, 50 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were given routine nursing care. The patients in the observation group were given high-quality nursing care. The indexes (glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose level 2 h), quality of life score and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the levels of HbA1c and fasting blood glucose in the observation group were (5.2 ± 0.9)%, (4.2 ± 0.3) mmol / L and (7.1 ± 3.5) mmol / L, respectively The levels of hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose at 2 h were (6.9 ± 1.1)%, (6.6 ± 0.4) mmol / L and (8.9 ± 2.4) mmol / L respectively. The indexes in observation group were better than those in control group The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The scores of physical function, psychological function, social function and physical life of the observation group were (65.2 ± 3.1), (44.9 ± 4.2), (60.7 ± 4.8) and (52.4 ± 4.5) (51.9 ± 4.9), (38.6 ± 5.2), (53.8 ± 4.9) and (56.6 ± 3.7) points respectively. The score of each index in the observation group was better than that in the control group (P <0.05). The nursing satisfaction (96.0%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (82.0%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The quality nursing methods have a far-reaching impact on the prognosis and lifestyle of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which is worth further promotion and application.