论文部分内容阅读
根据老年性基底节区脑梗塞具有神经纤维损伤重、临床治疗效果差及预后不良之特点,我们选用三组不同的血液稀释药和血管扩张药对115例患者进行了盲法对比观察。1.资料与方法:115例中,中、大面积梗塞35例,多发性梗塞47例,腔隙性梗塞32例,平均年龄63岁。瘫肢肌力0级35例,Ⅰ~Ⅱ级47例,Ⅳ~Ⅴ级33例。均经头颅CT扫描确诊。随机分组治疗:①组26例,用综合治疗。即706代血浆500ml(平均分子量1万)加复方丹参8ml(生药8g),
According to the characteristics of senile basal ganglia infarction with nerve fiber damage, poor clinical treatment and poor prognosis, we selected three groups of different hemodilution drugs and vasodilators in 115 patients blind comparison. 1. Materials and Methods: Among the 115 cases, 35 were medium, large and large infarcts, 47 were multiple infarcts, and 32 were lacunar infarcts with a mean age of 63 years. Paralytic limb strength 0 35 cases, Ⅰ ~ Ⅱ 47 cases, Ⅳ ~ Ⅴ 33 cases. All were confirmed by skull CT scan. Randomized treatment: ① group of 26 cases, with comprehensive treatment. That is 706 generations of plasma 500ml (average molecular weight 10,000) plus compound Salvia 8ml (crude drug 8g),