论文部分内容阅读
运用科斯定理可以对民事诉讼中双方当事人之间的“和解”要价进行定量分析,但是科斯定理分析问题的一个重要假设是“信息完美”,这在现实中是不存在的。博弈论认为策略行为的实质是博取“私人信息”,诉讼的发生率与信息不对称有较大的关联。庭审程序的设计要有利于各方获取他方的证据信息,便于当事人进行信息比较和估计;庭审过程应便于当事人获取对称的决策信息为目标;法官在庭审过程中的作用就是引导当事人从不完美信息趋向完美信息。双方当事人会根据证据交换、庭审质证认证的情况并结合自己可以接受的成本和风险底限决定自己的强硬策略值最终达到策略均衡。
Coase theorem can be used to quantitatively analyze the “reconciliation” price between the two parties in civil litigation. However, an important hypothesis of Coase Theorem analysis is “information perfection”, which does not exist in reality. Game theory that the essence of strategic behavior is to win “private information”, the incidence of litigation and information asymmetry have a greater relevance. The trial procedure should be designed so that all parties can obtain the other party’s evidence information to facilitate the parties to compare and estimate the information. The trial process should be convenient for the parties to obtain the symmetrical decision-making information as the goal. The judge’s role in the trial process is to guide the parties from imperfect information Trend perfect information. Both parties will decide their hard-line strategy value based on the exchange of evidence, the trial of certification and the combination of their acceptable cost and risk floor, and finally reach strategic equilibrium.