论文部分内容阅读
管樺著中篇小說《辛俊地》发表后,曾在《文艺报》1958年第12、13期上展开了討論,对这部作品有许多不同的看法。例如:有人认为这是一部有意义的極为优秀的作品,作者对人物的描写和处理有着过人的見地,辛俊地这个人物能發人深思,促人猛醒。有人認为作者的创作已走上危險的歧途了,作者没有站在無产阶級的立场上,来揭露和批判个人英雄主义,而是以欣賞的态度来对待个人主义的恶劣作風。有人认为对辛俊地进行批判是作者的基本态度,但是由于作者错誤地把辛俊地看作是忠心于革命事业的人,过于偏爱,也就批判得不深了,要向作者提出更高的要求,应该批判得更深刻些,等等。此外,《文史哲》1958年第9期也刊登了“《辛俊地》是一株毒草”的文章。这里转載的是李希凡同志在《收获》1958年第5期上發表的文章的摘要。
After her publication of “Xin Jun Di”, a novel by Xin Hua, Guan Hua held discussions in the 12th and 13th editions of the “Arts and Literature” in 1958. There are many different opinions on this work. For example: Some people think that this is a very meaningful work of great excellence, the author of the description and handling of the characters have extraordinary insight, Xin Jun to this person can be thought-provoking, prompted people to wake up. Some people think that the author’s creation has come to a dangerous end. The author did not stand on the proletarian standpoint in order to expose and criticize individual heroism, but to appreciate the bad attitude of individualism. Some people think that criticizing Xin Jun is the author’s basic attitude. However, since the author mistakenly regarded Xin Jun as a person who loyal to the cause of revolution, he was too partial to criticism and wanted to make the author even more High demands should be criticized more profoundly, and so on. In addition, “Literature, History and Philosophy,” 1958, No. 9 also published “” Xin Jun to “is a poisonous weeds” article. What is reproduced here is a summary of the articles published by Comrade Li Xifan on the 5th edition of Harvest 1958.