论文部分内容阅读
关于两《唐书·食货志》的评价 ,自古学者多有分歧 ,有的认为《新志》优于《旧志》,有的则认为《旧志》优于《新志》,本文通过对新、旧二《志》编纂方法与原则、结构、份量的比较 ,论述了两《唐书·食货志》各自的优缺点及史料价值 ,认为《旧志》与《新志》互有短长 ,各有千秋 ,我们对其应择善而从 ,不可偏信。
There are many disagreements between ancient scholars and scholars about the evaluation of the two Books of Tang, Food and Goods. Some think that “New Records” is superior to “Old Records”, while others think “Old Records” is superior to “New Records” Comparing the compilation methods, principle, structure and weight of the new and old “Chi”, discusses the respective advantages and disadvantages and the historical value of the two “Tang Books and Foodstuffs”, holds that the “old Chi” and the “new Chi” each other Short and long, each has its advantages and disadvantages, we should be based on their good, not bias.