论文部分内容阅读
恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪是信用卡诈骗犯罪中一种较为常见的类型,而该罪司法实践中存在很多有争议的情况,如犯罪数额认定问题、两次催收后未满“三个月”时间截点立案的问题,以及实务界和学术界争议很多的“关于两次催收”的问题等等。鉴于此,本文旨在通过对分析李某信用卡诈骗案来探讨其中所涉及的争议问题,并建议立法和司法机关通过有效的立法或司法途径对司法实践中的争议之处予给明确的解释,以减少争议,统一司法判案的标准。
Malicious overdraft credit card fraud is one of the more common types of crimes of credit card fraud. There are many controversial situations in the judicial practice of crime, such as the determination of the amount of crime, two months after the expiration of “three months” Time cut-off filing of the issue, as well as substantive and academic controversies “on the two collection” and so on. In view of this, this article aims to discuss the controversial issues involved in the analysis of Lee credit card fraud, and suggests that the legislative and judicial organs should give a clear explanation of the disputes in judicial practice through effective legislative or judicial channels, In order to reduce the controversy and unify the standard of judicial adjudication.