论文部分内容阅读
通过实例比较分析了AHP法、熵权法、熵AHP法3种森林可持续经营指标权重计算方法,及线性加权和法、指数加权法2种森林可持续经营综合评价模型。研究表明:在评价指标的权重计算方面,熵AHP方法集专家决策与数据信息决策于一体,客观科学;在森林可持续经营综合评价方面,指数加权法模型考虑了森林经营的多目标和协调发展要求,较接近森林经营现实。因此,基于熵AHP方法的指数加权法模型是一种可行的森林可持续经营综合评价方法。
Through the example analysis, AHP method, entropy method and entropy AHP method were used to calculate the weight of three sustainable forest management indicators, and two kinds of comprehensive evaluation models of sustainable forest management including linear weighted sum method and exponential weighted method. The research shows that entropy AHP method combines decision-making of experts and decision-making of data and information in the aspect of weight calculation of evaluation index, and is objective and scientific. In the aspect of comprehensive evaluation of sustainable forest management, index-weighted method takes into account the multi-objective and coordinated development of forest management Requirements, closer to the reality of forest management. Therefore, exponential weight method based on entropy AHP method is a feasible method for comprehensive evaluation of sustainable forest management.