论文部分内容阅读
指纹信息具有特定性、稳定性和触物留痕性,在法律性质上属于个人信息。个人信息有敏感与一般之分,前者受隐私权保护,后者可成为财产权客体。指纹信息属于敏感个人信息,但隐私公开在信息社会下具有相对性,即在特定领域内公开并不意味着在任何领域均公开,所以指纹搜集并不必然侵害隐私权。隐私权作为一项基本权利,对其限制须受公法规制,即须符合法律保留原则和比例原则。指纹搜集缺乏相关授权法律,不符合法律保留原则;未建立完善的配套制度,未必符合比例原则。建议立法机关出台《个人信息保护法》,以补足指纹考勤等信息利用的合法性。
Fingerprint information with specificity, stability and trace of traceability belong to the legal nature of personal information. Personal information is sensitive and general, the former is protected by privacy, which can become the object of property rights. Fingerprint information is sensitive to personal information, but the disclosure of privacy in the information society has the relativity that in a particular area does not mean that disclosure in any area, so fingerprint collection does not necessarily infringe privacy. As a fundamental right, privacy should be subject to public law as its restrictions, that is, it must comply with the principle of legal reservation and the principle of proportionality. Fingerprint collection lack of relevant laws of authorization, does not meet the principle of legal reservation; did not establish a complete supporting system may not be in line with the principle of proportion. It is suggested that the legislature should promulgate the Law on the Protection of Personal Information in order to make full use of the legitimacy of such information as fingerprint attendance.