论文部分内容阅读
作为日本国比较法学的开创者,穗积陈重留下了优秀的先驱性业绩。与德国比较法学相比,穗积有关法律进化的研究主要针对的是当时日本法的状态与世界特别是欧洲法的发展阶段相比照,因此,在参酌对先进的欧洲的研究,从大局上指出法律进化方向这样的启蒙任务上,穗积法学有着很大的价值。但是,如若从东洋西洋在所不问、致力于法律事实的搜集,在此基础上分析探求法的进化法则这样一种伟大目标的实现而论,则不论是这样的魄力还是力量,穗积法学到底不及德国比较法学。毫无疑问,以当时日本国的研究水平来看,抱有这样的期待,根本都是不现实的。纵然是追随了德国比较法学,由于德国比较法学本身就有很多不足之处,所以穗积的研究基本上也已经到了极限了。
As a pioneer of comparative law in Japan, Spaniard left a good pioneering performance. Compared with German comparative jurisprudence, the research on the evolution of law concerning spike plot mainly focused on the comparison of the status of Japanese law with that of the world, especially the development of European law. Therefore, in considering the study of advanced Europe, we point out the general situation Legal evolution direction of such enlightening task, spike plot law has great value. However, if we look at the realization of such a great goal as the principle of the law of evolution that the law of the oceans is collected from the East at a time when we do not ask, commit ourselves to it, whether it be such courage or strength, In the end less than the German comparative law. Undoubtedly, it is simply unrealistic to expect such an expectation based on the research level in Japan at the time. In spite of the fact that German comparative law has followed, due to the fact that German comparative law itself has many shortcomings, the research on it has basically reached its limit.