论文部分内容阅读
目的对护理干预在偏头痛患者护理中的应用效果进行讨论与研究。方法选取偏头痛患者120例作为研究样本,将其平均分为对照组和研究组,遵循随机分配的分组原则,对照组患者60人,研究组患者60人。医护人员为对照组患者提供常规药物治疗及护理,研究组患者在对照组的基础上采用针对性护理干预,通过抑郁自评量表和焦虑自评量表对两组患者的状态进行评估,对比两组患者在DSD、SAS、VAS疼痛评分、头痛次数以及头痛发作时间等方面的指标。结果两组患者在接受护理后,相比于对照组,研究组患者在VAS疼痛评分、头痛频率以及头痛发作时间等方面的情况均优于对照组患者,差异P<0.05有统计学意义。研究组患者SDS评分(39.36±5.20)分,SAS评分(28.57±4.26)分,低对对照组患者,差异差异P<0.05有统计学意义。结论为偏头痛患者提供专门的护理干预能够有效缓解患者头痛症状,降低发作次数,改善患者抑郁、焦虑等不良情绪,临床价值值得推广。
Objective To discuss and study the effect of nursing intervention in the nursing of migraine patients. Methods A total of 120 migraine patients were selected as the study samples, which were divided equally into the control group and the study group. According to the randomized grouping principle, 60 patients in the control group and 60 in the study group. The medical staff provided the routine drug treatment and nursing for the control group patients. The study group patients used the targeted nursing intervention on the basis of the control group, and evaluated the state of the two groups by the depression self-rating scale and the anxiety self-rating scale Two groups of patients in the DSD, SAS, VAS pain score, the number of headache and headache attack time and other indicators. Results Compared with the control group, the patients in the two groups were better than the control group in the VAS pain score, the frequency of headache and headache attack time, the difference P <0.05 was statistically significant. SDS score (39.36 ± 5.20) and SAS score (28.57 ± 4.26) in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions Providing specialized nursing interventions for migraine patients can effectively relieve the symptoms of headache, reduce the number of seizures and improve the patients’ depression and anxiety. The clinical value is worth popularizing.