论文部分内容阅读
古典社会学著作在解释已发生巨变的经济和社会方面正在日益失去作用。然而,关于这种转型的各类“后××”的分析,特别是后现代时期对语言语篇分析的侧重还远远不够。有鉴于此,本文作者主张用不同主题设定常量来描述和决定不同变量。为理解目前发生的巨变,本文建议将来的社会学应力图经验化、历时化并跨领域比较。设定了这样一些常数,社会学就不会为“缺少理论”而忧心忡忡。
Classical sociological writings are increasingly losing the power to explain the dramatic economic and social changes that have taken place. However, the analysis of the various “post-XX” transitions about this transition, especially in the postmodern period, is still far from sufficient focus on linguistic discourse analysis. In view of this, the authors advocate the use of different themes set constants to describe and decide on different variables. In order to understand the current tremendous changes, this paper suggests that future sociological studies should be empirical, diachronic, and cross-domain comparisons. With such constants set, sociology does not worry about “lack of theory.”