论文部分内容阅读
在精神疾病司法鉴定(以下简称鉴定)工作中,就其刑事责任能力问题,国内基本采用“三分法”,即完全刑事责任能力、限定刑事责任能力和无刑事责任能力.刑法第15条是判定刑事责任能力最根本的法律依据,然而在如何去理解、实践刑法第15条却存在着不尽相同之处和需要进一步统一认识的地方.目前,我国法律条文尚不十分完善,在行为(精神疾病患者)对自己犯罪行为的辨认或控制能力有所减弱(不完全有亦未完全丧失),而应负有限定刑事责任能力尚未有明确法律条文规定的情况下,来讨论或进一步制定有关限定刑事责任能力问题,对鉴定工作的开展无疑是颇有俾益的.现就我院鉴定组判定具有限定刑事责任能力的32例鉴定案例进行分析和讨论.
In the judicial appraisal of mental illness (hereinafter referred to as the appraisal), in terms of its criminal responsibility, the basic domestic use of the “trichotomy”, that is, full criminal responsibility, limited criminal responsibility and no criminal responsibility .Article 15 of the Criminal Law However, how to understand and implement Article 15 of criminal law, there are many differences and need to further unify the understanding of the place.At present, our country’s legal provisions are not yet perfect, in the behavior ( Mentally ill patients) have reduced their ability to recognize or control their crimes (incompletely or completely) and have limited criminal responsibility to discuss or further develop the relevant laws without clear legal provisions Defining the capacity of criminal responsibility undoubtedly benefits the appraisal work, and analyzes and discusses 32 appraisal cases judged by our appraisal team that have limited criminal responsibility.