论文部分内容阅读
在鲁迅的晚期杂文中,有一批直接针对20世纪30年代文化复古思潮而精心撰写的批评文字,其叙述方式和言说策略,迥异于以往杂文的创作思路,颇有特色。在揭示“五四”新文化运动以后的新文人何以隐隐都有一种复古倾向时,鲁迅一般先从语言分析入手,以解析当时较流行的“文言复兴”话题为基础,运用语言知识和语言技巧来剖解文本及其裂隙,经由语言这个媒介,去探索语言主体在语言裂隙中所呈现的社会意识和社会关系。鲁迅从语言的变迁中看到了“权势”的转移,发现了这种压迫机制产生的秘密方式,并用自己的杂文同参与生产这种压迫机制的人(不管是朋友还是师长)开展论争。
Among the late essays in Lu Xun, there are a number of critical essays drafted directly in response to the retro trend of culture in the 1930s. Their narrative and speech tactics are quite different from those of previous essays. When revealing that the new writers after the “May 4th” New Culture Movement had a vague vintage tendency, Lu Xun generally started with language analysis and based on the analysis of the more popular “ Knowledge and language skills to dissect the text and its cracks, through the medium of language to explore the main body of the language in the language gap presented by the social awareness and social relations. From the change of language, Lu Xun saw the shift of ”power ", discovered the secret way that this oppression mechanism was generated, and used his essay to engage in debate with the people (whether friends or teachers) who took part in the production of such oppressions.