论文部分内容阅读
笔者在本刊1983年第三期发表的《浓度对化学平衡移动影响实验中的一个误解》一文中,根据离子方程式标志电解质在溶液里所起的化学变化的实质,说明强电解质KCl在这里即在生成Fe(SON)_3的平衡体系中]实际上没有参加反应,从而证明了强电解质KCl与该反应的化学平衡移动无关。这一点还是正确的。但因笔者水平较差,在后面写了“因此对于溶液中的可逆反应来说,应用化学平衡移动原理说明平衡移动方向只适用于加入弱电解质溶液。”这一不正确的结论,不得不使读者误认为加入能使该化学平衡移动的物质只能是弱电
In the article “A Misunderstanding of Concentration Effects on Chemical Balance Movement Experiments” published in the third issue of the journal in 1983, the authors used the ion equation to mark the nature of the chemical changes that electrolytes play in the solution, indicating that the strong electrolyte KCl is In the equilibrium system for the formation of Fe(SON)_3] there was virtually no reaction, demonstrating that the strong electrolyte KCl is not related to the chemical equilibrium shift of this reaction. This is still true. However, because the author’s level is poor, he writes behind it. Therefore, for the reversible reaction in solution, applying the principle of chemical equilibrium shift indicates that the direction of equilibrium movement is only applicable to the addition of weak electrolyte solution." This incorrect conclusion cannot be The reader is not mistaken for the fact that adding substances that can shift the chemical equilibrium can only be