遗迹成了地方的标志,它引起并深化支持一种特殊情结,把文化视作“财产”和“身份”标志。遗迹所刻记的记忆和所标志的历史通常被视为共享的公共叙事的有机部分,并不断加强身份意识和正统性意识。各种团体渐渐地利用尚未固定、还在争议和充满矛盾的记忆、叙事和遗迹来实现这种效果。遗迹事实上成为一个充满争议的场域——甚至是一个战场。记忆干预在纪念景观中引起微妙的但不乏意义的转变上,具有既个别又累积的意义,在一定程度上能把遗迹抢救成一种道德空间,使其不仅能认证某种认同,而且可以促成更复杂(往往是人性化和世界主义的)地对一些问题的反思,如对过去、现在与未来之间关系的反思,对遗迹本身性质的反思。 Relics have become the hallmarks of the place, causing and deepening support for a special complex that treats culture as a sign of “property” and “status.” The engraved memories and the marked history of relics are often viewed as an integral part of a shared public narrative and are constantly increasing awareness of identity and orthodoxy. Various groups are gradually using this unfounded, still controversial and contradictory memory, narrative and relics to achieve this effect. Remains of fact become a controversial field - even a battlefield. Memories of intervention, both memorial and meaningful in the memorial landscape, have both individual and cumulative meanings that to some extent can save the remains in a moral space that not only certifies a certain identity but also contributes to more Complex (often humane and cosmopolitan) reflections on issues such as reflection on the relationship between the past, the present and the future, and reflection on the nature of the remains.