论文部分内容阅读
尽管科技编辑方法论的运用离不开编辑的科技基础知识素养(不是学科专业知识),也不可取代专家审稿,但是,在编辑实践中是否掌握这方法论和是否自觉运用这方法论,工作效果是大不一样的。我从事科技编辑工作10年的实践经验中感到有两个方法对提高编辑技能和期刊编辑质量是很切实有用的。 1.逻辑推理法众所周知,今天没有几个学者能够不加限制地自称为某一学科的专家(维纳),作为较少参与具体科技实践活动的科技编辑,更不可能成为兼通百家的博士。面对各专业、
Although the application of editorial methodology of science and technology is inseparable from the editors’ basic knowledge of science and technology (not subject expertise) and can not replace the expert review, whether or not to grasp this method in editorial practice and whether to consciously apply this method of work is large Different. In my 10 years of practical experience in editing science and technology, I felt that there are two ways to improve the editing skills and the quality of journal editing is very useful. 1. Logical reasoning As we all know, few scholars today can call themselves unbiased experts in a subject (Wiener), as less involved in scientific and technological activities of specific scientific and technological activities, editing, but also impossible to become a full complement of 100 Dr. In the face of various professions,