论文部分内容阅读
修改后刑诉法增加了当事人和解的公诉案件诉讼程序,使得刑事和解实践探索正式走向制度化。修改后刑诉法实施以来,各地检察机关在积极实践刑事和解制度的同时,也面临着自身在理念、程序、机制等方面的角色定位问题。在此,笔者结合实践中检察机关践行刑事和解制度的具体做法,谈谈修改后刑诉法背景下刑事和解制度中检察机关的角色定位问题。一、刑事和解制度中检察机关角色定位的法律依据。修改后
After the amendment, the Criminal Procedure Law increased litigation procedures of public prosecution for the parties’ reconciliation, which made the exploration of criminal reconciliation practice formally institutionalized. Since the implementation of the revised Criminal Procedure Law, procuratorate organs in various places have also faced their own role localization in concepts, procedures and mechanisms while actively implementing the criminal reconciliation system. Here, the author combines the practical practice of procuratorial organs to practice criminal reconciliation system, and talks about the role of procuratorial organs in the criminal reconciliation system under the revised Criminal Procedure Law. First, the criminal reconciliation system, the legal basis for the role of the procuratorial organs. Modified