论文部分内容阅读
行政调解中的合法原则是我国各类调解中被普遍接受的一个基本原则。但该原则与调解的制度原理和实践存在内在冲突,有必要重新作出解释。这需要对行政调解的对象——民事争议和行政争议进行分类讨论。分析的难点是对行政争议进行行政调解时的合法标准。对此,本文从多元正义论、新法律现实主义、实践理性和实质法治主义等角度进行分析,以期确立一个以实质正义、良好社会效果为取向的、动态灵活的新标准。
The principle of lawfulness in administrative mediation is a basic principle universally accepted in all kinds of mediations in our country. However, there is an inherent conflict between this principle and the system principles and practice of conciliation, and it is necessary to re-explain it. This needs to classify the objects of administrative mediation - civil disputes and administrative disputes. The difficulty of analysis is the legal standard in the administrative mediation of administrative disputes. In this regard, this article analyzes from the perspectives of pluralistic justice, new legal realism, practical rationality and substantive legalism with a view to establishing a new standard of dynamic and flexible oriented to substantive justice and good social effects.