论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨改良式剖宫产术的临床价值。方法:对传统式剖宫产术、以色列式剖宫产术(the MisgavLadachMethod)以及改良式剖宫产术各60例的各项指标进行比较。结果：在切皮到胎儿娩出时间、手术时间、出血量和住院天数方面，各组间差异有显著性，其中改良式剖宫产术在以上各项中所用时间最短，出血量最少(P<0．05或P<0．01)，其后依次是以色列式剖宫产术和传统式剖宫产术；术后排气时间比较，改良式剖宫产术与以色列式剖宫产术差异无显著性，但两者均短于传统式剖宫产术(P<0．05)；3种手术方法新生儿Apgar评分比较无差异。结论：改良式剖宫产术操作简单，优点明显，值得临床推广。
Objective: To explore the clinical value of modified cesarean section. Methods: The traditional cesarean section, the Israeli-style cesarean section (the MisgavLadachMethod) and modified cesarean section of the 60 cases of various indicators were compared. Results: There was a significant difference among the groups in terms of incision to fetus delivery time, operation time, blood loss and length of stay, among which the modified cesarean section had the shortest time and the least amount of bleeding (P < 0.05 or P <0.01), followed by the Israeli-style cesarean section and traditional cesarean section; postoperative exhaust time, modified cesarean section and Israeli-style cesarean section difference However, both were shorter than conventional cesarean section (P <0.05). There was no difference in Apgar score among the three surgical methods. Conclusion: The modified cesarean section is simple in operation and has obvious advantages and worthy of clinical promotion.