论文部分内容阅读
司法实践中对刑法第一百一十四条、第一百一十五条第一款“其他危险方法”的认定存在只注重“结果危险性”而忽视“行为危险性”的倾向,将具有多重特定危险属性的行为、能够衍生公共危险状态的行为、具有非危险属性的连续行为纳入“其他危险方法”的范围。这种倾向对上述法条中的罪名关系出现认识偏差,限制了其他罪名的适用,与罪数理论相冲突,实质上也违背了罪刑法定原则,应当予以修正。在认定“其他危险方法”时,应将“结果危险性”与“行为危险性”的评价标准相结合,并处理好相关罪名之间的竞合关系。
In the judicial practice, the existence of the 114th article of the Criminal Law and the 1th paragraph of the “115th article” of “the other dangerous methods” of the 115th article only focuses on the “result of the danger” and neglects “the risk of behavior ”, The tendency of having multiple specific dangerous attributes, the behaviors capable of deriving public dangerous conditions, and the continuous behaviors with non-dangerous attributes should be included in the scope of“ other dangerous methods ”. The deviation of understanding of the relationship between the crimes in the above-mentioned law and the limitation of the application of other charges contradicts the theory of crime number, and in essence violates the principle of legality of crimes and punishments and should be amended. When identifying “other hazard methods,” you should combine the “risk of detection” with the evaluation criteria of “risk of behavior” and handle the co-opetitive relationship between the offenses.