论文部分内容阅读
在三个基层检察院的实证调查表明,检察官在适用青少年保护公诉政策和经济发展与社会管理公诉政策进行公诉裁量时,有不同的行动机制。表面上,不同的行动机制与检察院推行的目标考核机制有关;本质上,却因为实践中针对前者的政策明确,针对后者的政策不明确。由此,为了激发检察官政策性公诉裁量的动力,有必要由最高人民检察院制定明确与统一的公诉政策。这除了可以实现通过公诉政策调控公诉制度运作的目的之外,更为现实的意义还在于可以阻隔种种非正当性因素对公诉制度的渗透以及增强公诉制度运作的透明性。
An investigation in three grassroots procuratorates shows that prosecutors have different mechanisms of action when applying prosecutorial adjudication on the public prosecutorial policy on adolescent protection and public prosecutors on economic development and social management. On the surface, different mechanisms of action are related to the objective assessment mechanism promoted by the Procuratorate; in essence, the policy targeted at the former is clear and the policy on the latter is not clear. Therefore, in order to arouse the impetus of prosecutors’ policy-making discretion, it is necessary for the Supreme People’s Procuratorate to formulate a clear and unified prosecutorial policy. In addition to the purpose of regulating the operation of the public prosecution system through public prosecutorial policies, it is more realistic to stop the infiltration of public prosecutorial systems by various unfair factors and to enhance the transparency of the operation of the public prosecution system.