论文部分内容阅读
在哪里并以何种方式对恐怖分子进行审判,是依法反恐中的一个重要问题。这个问题不仅涉及如何有效追究恐怖主义犯罪的刑事责任,更能直观反映出国家在对待恐怖主义犯罪被告人人权时的基本态度。尊重并坚持法治原则应当是依法反恐的根本,面对恐怖主义犯罪,刑事法治也要致力于实现双重目的:为社会提供一个惩治违法者的机会,同时确保被告人庭审中的基本权利。审判恐怖分子不同的庭审模式和程序的背后实质上是国家在犯罪追诉的高效性和公正审判、国家安全利益与个人诉讼权利之间的平衡与考量。价值选择的过程伴随了制度和规则设计的技术性,因此通过考察不同国家的庭审结构模式有助于我们清晰地认识程序设计的历史背景、价值目标及
Where and how to try terrorists is an important issue in fighting terrorism in accordance with the law. This issue not only concerns how to effectively investigate the criminal responsibility of terrorist crimes, but also can directly reflect the basic attitude of the state in handling the human rights of the defendant for terrorist crimes. Respecting and upholding the principle of the rule of law should be the fundamental basis of fighting terrorism in accordance with the law. In the face of terrorism crimes, the criminal law and rule of law should also be devoted to achieving the dual goal of providing society with an opportunity to punish those who violate the law and at the same time ensure the basic rights of the accused in trial. Behind the different trial models and procedures for the trial of terrorists is essentially the balance and consideration of the state in the efficiency and fair trial of criminal prosecutions, the interests of national security and the rights of individual litigation. The process of value selection is accompanied by the technicality of the system and rule design. Therefore, by examining the trial structure model in different countries, it helps us to clearly understand the historical background of the program design, the value target and