论文部分内容阅读
近年来,围绕着深圳的杨剑昌、河南的吕净一、海南的何海生、山西的李绿松等人的反腐行为,民间反腐成为一个热点话题。虽然民间反腐不能构成反腐的主导力量,但未可一概排斥。如何使民间反腐与现有的反腐机制良性互动,不至走向盲目;同时也使现有反腐机制在民间资源配合下,更有效地清除贪腐病毒,这个问题已引起学术界关注。如果能尽快影响决策,则中国反腐幸甚。 不久前,《中国改革》等多家新闻媒体在京召开了一个研讨会:贯彻“三个代表”和反腐败。在会上,青年法学家肖瀚
In recent years, anti-corruption has become a hot topic around Yang Jianchang in Shenzhen, Lu Jingyi in Henan Province, He Haisheng in Hainan and Li Lusong in Shanxi Province. Although non-governmental anti-corruption can not constitute the dominant anti-corruption force, it can not be completely rejected. How to make the non-governmental anti-corruption and the existing anti-corruption mechanism play a positive interaction not to go blindly, but also make the existing anti-corruption mechanism cooperate with the private resources to eliminate the corruption virus more effectively. This issue has aroused the concern of the academic circles. If China can influence its decision-making as soon as possible, its anti-corruption will be very good. Not long ago, a number of news media such as “China’s reform” held a seminar in Beijing: implementing the “Three Represents” and fighting corruption. At the meeting, young jurist Xiao Han