论文部分内容阅读
戴震《屈原赋注》中《音义》三卷署名为汪梧凤,后之学者不察其究而以之为是。如游国恩《楚辞讲录》,褚斌杰校《屈原赋注》的前言皆以《音义》三卷为汪梧凤所作。但是,若对跋文做一番推理,就会发现事实并非如此。汪梧凤跋文云: 右据戴君注本为《音义》三卷。自乾隆壬申秋,得《屈原赋戴氏注》九卷读之,常置案头,少有所疑,检古文旧籍,详加研核,兼考各本异同,其有阙然不注者,大致文辞旁涉,
Dai Zhen “Qu Yuan Fu Note” in the “meaning” three volumes signed Wang Wufeng, after the scholar of the investigation is not. Such as Youguoen “Chu speech”, Chu Binjie school “Qu Yuan Fu Note,” the preface with the “meaning” three volumes for Wang WFeng made. However, if you make some reasoning about Postscript, you will find that this is not the case. Wang Wufeng postscript cloud: according to Dai Jun Note this as “meaning” three volumes. Since the Qianlong Ren Shenqiu, “Qu Yuan Fu Dai Notes” nine volumes read, often set the desk, few suspicions, check the ancient books and old books, detailed study of the nuclear, and test the similarities and differences, there are no sign of those who note , Generally speaking next to the speech,