论文部分内容阅读
作为宋明理学前后期的集大成者朱熹、王阳明,学界一般将其分别作为理学、心学的代表性人物。本文认为,朱熹、王阳明虽在形上之上达面分属理学、心学不同谱系,但就形下之下学而言,两者却是隶属同一谱系。本文以时间线索,分别从早年、中年、晚年解析王阳明承继朱子之学。早年,阳明循朱子“格物”之法而不得其门,但朱子问题域意识一下学而上达已烙印于阳明的心中。中年,阳明经“龙场悟道”而体知本心,然于下学,阳明只是有此意识问题,至于下学与上达的关系,阳明还在不断地探索、调整。晚年,阳明揭“致良知”之教,由此而回归朱子之学的下学而上达,从而圆融地解决了下学与上达的关系。此标示着王阳明思想的圆熟。
As a pre-Song and Ming and Ming Dynasties master Zhu Xi, Wang Yangming, the academic community generally as a representative of Neo-Confucianism, psychology. This paper argues that although Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming are above the metaphysics, they belong to the same genealogies and different genealogies of psychology. However, in terms of inferiority, the two belong to the same lineage. This article uses time clues to analyze Wang Yangming from the early, middle and late years respectively and inherit the philosophy of Zhu Zi. In the early years, Yang Ming followed Zhu Zi’s law of “matter” and did not get its own way, but Zhu Zi’s awareness of the problem domain was top-down and imprinted on Yangming’s mind. Middle age, Yang Ming by “Dragon Field enlightenment ” and know the heart, then go to school, Yangming just have this awareness issue, as to the relationship between school and Shang Yang, Yang Ming is still constantly exploring and adjusting . In his later years, Yang Ming exposes the teachings of “conscience to the conscience”, and thus returns to the school of learning of Zhu Xi, which solves the relationship between going to school and going up. This marks the maturity of Wang Yangming’s thought.