论文部分内容阅读
作为乾嘉考据学的巨擘,钱大昕在历史考据学,尤其是对历代正史文献的考证成果丰硕,其考证的方法与成就均对后来的研究者有着很大的启发,学者对此已有较为充分的认识。笔者因修订点校本《新唐书》之机,全面核查了钱大昕对《新唐书·方镇表》的考订文字,发现钱氏是第一位全面系统地考订《方镇表》并取得重要成果的学者,其部分结论应当为我们的修订工作所吸收。同时我们也发现钱氏的考证存在固泥之嫌,对史料的处理也有不当之处。这是在前人研究成果的基础上对钱氏历史考据学专题进行深入研究的一次尝试。
As a guru of Qianjia textual criticism, Qian Daxin has made great achievements in the textual research of history texts, especially the textual research of the official history textures of various dynasties. The methods and achievements of his research have great enlightenment to later researchers. A more adequate understanding. Due to the revision of the school-based “New Tang Book,” I fully verified Qian Daxin’s examination of the “New Tang Shu Fang Zhen Table” and found that Qian was the first to conduct a comprehensive and systematic examination of the “Fang Zhen Table” Some scholars who have made important achievements should have their conclusions absorbed in our revision work. At the same time, we also find that there is a solid foundation for the textual research of Qian’s theory. There are also some defects in the handling of historical data. This is an attempt to conduct an in-depth study of Qian’s historical research on the basis of previous research results.