论文部分内容阅读
借鉴美国的“SEC”一致性分析模式,考察与研究了历年上海市初中学业考试物理试卷与上海市物理课程标准之间的一致性,Porter一致性系数在0.580~0.700,这表明二者不具有显著的一致性.物理试卷在内容主题方面,加大了对“电磁运动”主题的考查,降低了对“能量”主题的考查;在认知层次上降低了“知道”和“理解”层次分值比率,加大了“掌握”与“应用”层次分值比率.最后对考察结果进行了分析与讨论.
By referring to the consistent “SEC” mode of analysis in the United States, the consistency between the physical examination papers of Shanghai junior middle school and physical course standards in Shanghai over the years was examined and studied. Porter consistency coefficient was between 0.580 and 0.700, indicating that both There is no significant consistency in the content of the physical examination papers in the field, increased the test of the “electromagnetic movement” theme, reducing the “energy” theme of the test; cognitive level reduced “know ”And “ comprehension ”, and increase the ratio of“ grasping ”to“ applying ”.Finally, we analyze and discuss the findings.