论文部分内容阅读
又是一年年终时。随着新旧交替导致家政服务需求的增加和保姆“返乡潮”矛盾的来临,“保姆荒”问题无疑会更为严重。按以往惯例,一些家政服务公司及雇主往往会不得不放宽录用条件,由此出现的纠纷自然也会随之大增。那么,面对来自保姆的侵害,雇主该如何维权呢?以下案例或许能让你有所启示或借鉴。保姆盗窃财物,家政必须担责【案例】2013年1月20日,邱晓娟与一家家政服务公司达成协议:由公司向邱晓娟提供一名保姆,负责为邱晓娟打扫整栋房屋的卫生,邱
It is the end of the year. As the old and the new alternate lead to an increase in the demand for housekeeping services and the ambush of nanny “homecoming ”, the problem of “nanny shortage ” will no doubt be more serious. In accordance with past practice, some domestic service companies and employers often have to relax the terms of employment. The resulting disputes will naturally skyrocket. So, in the face of abuse from nannies, how should the employer safeguard their rights? The following cases may give you some inspiration or reference. [Case] On January 20, 2013, Qiu Xiaojuan and a domestic service company reached an agreement: The company provided a nanny to Qiu Xiaojuan, who was responsible for cleaning the whole house for the health of Qiu Xiaojuan. Qiu Xiaojuan