论文部分内容阅读
目的观察元宫220IUD和Tcu220IUD在临床使用上的优缺点。方法将自愿放置宫内节育器而无禁忌症的育龄妇女240例,随机分为两组,分别放置元宫220IUD和Tcu220IUD各120例,并且对置入后的情况进行为期1年的随访分析,对比两组妇女的带器妊娠率、脱落率、以各种原因取环率、续用率及带环后各种不良反应的发生率。结果两组宫内节育器带器妊娠率、脱落率相比,P>0.05差异无统计学意义,放置Tcu220IUD较元宫220IUD因各种原因取出率P<0.05和带环后副反应率较高P<0.01。结论元宫220IUD其临床使用效果优于Tcu220IUD,它具有因各种原因取出率低及副反应少的特点,值得育龄妇女信赖。
Objective To observe the advantages and disadvantages of Yuan Gong 220IUD and Tcu220IUD in clinical use. Methods 240 pregnant women of childbearing age without contraindications who were placed on a voluntary basis were randomly divided into two groups, 120 cases of 220 UUD and 120 cases of Tcu220IUD respectively. The follow-up analysis was performed for one year after the implantation. The pregnancy rate and shedding rate were compared between the two groups of women, and the ring rate, the recovery rate and the incidence of various adverse reactions after band ringing were taken for various reasons. Results There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or shedding rate between two groups of IUDs (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in P> 0.05 between the two groups P <0.01. Conclusion Yuan Palace 220IUD its clinical use of superior results than Tcu220IUD, it has a low rate of removal for a variety of reasons and fewer side effects, it is worth the trust of childbearing women.