论文部分内容阅读
一20世纪80年代,阿瑟·丹托将关于艺术品本质的难题与涉及绘画的相对晚近的艺术运动作了一个出色的关联。毫无疑问,这成为了自《哲学对艺术的剥夺》(The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art)(1986)的出版至本综述之间长达20余年间分析美学中最有争议的论题之一。我想说,《哲学对艺术的剥夺》也是一个决定性的文本,以现在这种极富特征的形式和意义,赋予了丹托在另外20余年里曾零散表达、逐渐发展的主题的全部早期观点。我并不相信会有任何一
In the 1980s Arthur Danto made an excellent connection between the difficult questions about the nature of artwork and the relatively recent art movement involving painting. This, undoubtedly, became one of the most controversial topics in analytical aesthetics for more than two decades between the publication of The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (1986) and this review. I would like to say that “the deprivation of art by philosophy” is also a decisive text. With this extremely characteristic form and meaning of the present, all the early ideas of Danto’s fragmented and progressive themes in more than 20 years have been given . I do not believe there will be any one