福建共与和律师事务所张孝品认为:一个盗用单位公章借款的行为,同一法院已经在刑事上定性其为合同诈骗罪,而后在民事判决中又将其定性为民事上合法的“表见代理”行为。同一行为能否同时被认定为合同诈骗犯罪与合同法上的“表见代理”?在法理上,一个行为在法律属性上应当具有同 Fujian Gonghe and Zhang Xiao Pin, a law firm, said that one act of fraudulently borrowing a company’s official seal of approval and the same court criminalized it as a contract fraud and then, in a civil judgment, defined it as “civil-legal” “behavior. Can the same act be simultaneously identified as a ”contract seeker" on the contract fraud and contract law? In the legal sense, an act should have the same legal attribute