论文部分内容阅读
民事诉讼法的修改标志着我国证据保全制度正趋于完善。证据保全主体的多元化为当事人提供了多样性途径。在我国当前的法律体系中,公证证据保全和法院证据保全是确保证据效力的主要证据保全方式,两者在一定层面上有交叉点与相汇处,但也各具特色,为当事人带来了选择上的困惑。证据的公证保全和法院保全各有优势且效力相当,申请人根据自身案情的需要进行合理选择方为良策。
The revision of Civil Procedure Law indicates that the system of evidence preservation in our country is tending to be perfect. The diversification of the subject of evidence preservation provides the parties with a diversity of ways. In our current legal system, the preservation of notarized evidence and the preservation of court evidence are the main ways to ensure the validity of evidence. Both of them have intersections and reconciliations at a certain level, but they also have their own characteristics, which bring the parties The choice of confusion. The notarization of evidence and the preservation of court have their own advantages and their effectiveness is quite considerable. It is a good policy for the applicant to make a reasonable choice according to the needs of his own case.