论文部分内容阅读
Metallica 《Reload》《Load》出版后仅相隔一年,Metallica这支重金属大班便沉不住气地推出了新唱片《Reload》,让乐迷们吃惊他们的速度与做法,同时不免生疑:《Reload》的诞生是否是为了弥补《Load》的销量失利? 《Load》是Metallica走革新之路的第一张“探路者”唱片,可惜还没走远,《Reload》就又把“革新”的风格拉回到传统路线上去了。《Reload》是保守的,继承的是Metallica的一贯风格。这在第一首《Fuel》中便可明显觉出:咆哮的伴奏、失控的喧泄、整齐钢硬的Solo段,十足典型的“金属”旧式作风。当然专辑虽值一听,但不耐细细玩赏,虽使众多金属迷们倍感刺激,可未有多少惊悦:毕竟《Reload》没有什么突破。更况在整体水准上《Reload》比起91年的顶峰《Metallica》来要逊色很多,所以Metallica应该好好考虑这样一个问题:是为了商业走老路还是为了生存力求革新呢?商业与艺术的两难问题同样也让这支大名鼎鼎的乐队为难。
Metallica “Reload” Just one year after “Load” was released, Metallica, a heavy metal executive, unhesitatingly introduced a new record called “Reload” to surprise fans with their speed and approach, while doubting “ Reload ”is born to make up for the“ Load ”sales lost?“ Load ”is the first Metallica take the road to reform the first“ Pathfinder ”album, but unfortunately not far away,“ Reload ”put the“ innovation ” Style back to the traditional route up. “Reload” is conservative, inherited the consistent style of Metallica. This is evident in the first “Fuel”: roaring accompaniment, uncontrolled loudness, neat steel Solo, and a full-fledged “metal” old style. Of course, although the album is worth a listen, but impatient play carefully, although many metal fans feel more exciting, but not much pleasure: after all, “Reload” no breakthrough. Even worse overall, “Reload” is a lot less impressive than the 91-year-old “Metallica,” so Metallica should think carefully about whether to walk the streets for business or to survive for innovation. The dilemma of business and the arts Also let this famous band embarrassed.